Ayodhya Bar Association Resolves: No Lawyer Will Represent Accused in Ram Temple Donation Embezzlement Case; ₹5 Lakh Fine for Violators

Faizabad (Ayodhya), June 29, 2026 — In a significant development reflecting deep public sentiment, the Faizabad Bar Association (commonly referred to as the Ayodhya Bar Association) has unanimously resolved that none of its member lawyers will represent the eight accused persons arrested in the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple in Ayodhya.

The association further announced that any lawyer who violates this decision and chooses to appear on behalf of the accused will face a penalty of ₹5 lakh.

Advertisement

Resolution Passed in General Body Meeting

The decision was taken during the general body meeting of the Faizabad Bar Association on Monday. Bar Association President Kalika Prasad Mishra and other office bearers stated that the move was driven by the hurt sentiments of the legal fraternity and the larger community over the alleged theft of temple offerings.

“Our sentiments have been hurt by the theft of temple offerings. The lawyers of Faizabad have agreed not to plead on behalf of the arrested accused,” the association stated.

According to reports, the resolution makes it clear that any advocate who defies the collective decision will be liable to pay a fine of ₹5 lakh, and appropriate proceedings may be initiated against them.

Background: Alleged Embezzlement of Ram Temple Donations

The case involves the alleged misappropriation of donations and offerings made by devotees at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Eight individuals have been arrested in connection with the case. Police have conducted raids at multiple locations, and investigations are ongoing.

Devotees from across India and abroad regularly offer money, gold, and other valuables at the temple. The alleged diversion or theft of such funds has triggered widespread outrage, particularly because these are considered sacred offerings made with deep faith.

Advertisement

Local lawyers have expressed that defending the accused in such a matter goes against their personal and collective sentiments, given the sanctity of the Ram Temple.

Implications for the Accused

The resolution effectively means the eight accused may find it extremely difficult to secure legal representation from lawyers based in Ayodhya/Faizabad.

Legal experts note that while bar associations can express collective views, every accused person retains the fundamental right to legal defence under the Constitution. The accused may now have to engage lawyers from other districts or cities, or the court may appoint legal aid counsel if they are unable to find representation.

Some reports also indicate that the Bar Association has discussed demanding a CBI probe into the matter and has expressed willingness to approach higher courts if necessary.

Strong Public Sentiment

The Ram Temple in Ayodhya holds immense religious significance for Hindus worldwide. Donations and offerings made there are viewed not merely as financial contributions but as acts of devotion (bhakti and seva).

Any alleged misuse of these funds is seen by many as a direct affront to the faith of millions of devotees. This appears to be the primary reason behind the strong and unified stance taken by the local legal community.

While the Bar Association’s decision reflects the intense emotions surrounding the case, it also raises questions about the right to a fair trial. In the past, courts have generally discouraged blanket boycotts by bar associations, emphasising that every accused — regardless of the nature of allegations — is entitled to competent legal representation.

It remains to be seen how the local courts respond to this development and whether the accused will be able to secure defence counsel from outside the regi