Very interesting information👌

POOR BRAHMINS

Advertisement

It is amazing to see that how fiction can become truth in course of time!
Let's examine truth based on facts and real history.

  1. To start with, there is not a SINGLE Brahmin God in Hinduism!
  2. All Gods are from backward castes, dalits and tribals.
  3. Brahmins never created the concept of Gods in Hinduism.
  4. There was not even a SINGLE Brahmin king that ruled India.
  5. To be able to oppress others requires positions of power. Brahmins were teachers, scholars, priests, advisors but not rulers.
  6. The Brahmins' traditional occupation was that of temple priest (purohit), officiating religious functions. Their sole income was biksha (alms) given by the landlords (non-Brahmins).
  7. Another section of Brahmins were teachers, that too without salary.
  8. Vedic literature was mostly written by non-Brahmins. The most powerful of the dharma shaastra, that gives Brahmins a high status, is the Manusmriti written by Manu, a non-Brahmin. Brahmin means a profession (Varna) - not a caste.
  9. If the reading and writing of Sanskrit was confined to Brahmins, then how do you have the tribal Valmiki composing Ramayana? Ved Vyas, who classified four Vedas and wrote Mahabharata, was born to a fisherwoman.
  10. Sanskrit was used mostly by non-Brahmin writers - there are very few scriptures in Sanskrit authored by Brahmins.
  11. We consider the teachings of Ved Vyas, Vashishta, Valmiki, Krishna, Rama, Agasthya, Vishwamitra, Shrunga, Gowtama, Buddha, Mahavira, Tulsidas, Thiruvalluvar, Kabir, Vivekananda, Gandhi, Narayana guru etc. as most valuable.
  12. If none of them were Brahmins, why cry out loudly that "Brahmins did not allow you to learn?" There are numerous works on bhakti by non-Brahmin bhakti saints.
  13. Brahmins never prevented others from learning.
  14. Brahmins were neither rich nor powerful at any point of time in history. Pick up any old Indian story book, you will see gharib Brahmin’ (Poor Brahmin) quoted as a virtue. (Remember Sudama-Krishna story?)
  15. Though their profession was considered as highest stature of the society, the Brahmin ascetics' only way of survival was alms given by people.
  16. The biggest contribution of Brahmins is sustaining the best language ever spoken on the earth - Sanskrit. If you learn English or Arabic, you have commercial benefits.
  17. Nobody ever promoted Sanskrit.
    Without any benefits, Brahmins took up voluntary task of learning Sanskrit. Now you accuse them of monopoly in Sanskrit!
    Besides, Brahmins were not Kings. They didn't enjoy powers or had wealth. They worked hard on gaining knowledge and led life of austerity. So there is no question of exploitation by Brahmins.
    When population of Brahmins range from just 2% in Tamil Nadu to 12% in Uttarakhand, how can they dominate the majority?
    After reading all these can anyone blame Brahmins?
    Please forward to as many as possible and kill this virus of misinformation dividing the society.

For More Devotional Journey, Follow

Advertisement

What does Varna actually mean, and how did it differ from hereditary caste?

The word Varna derives from the Sanskrit root 'vṛ', meaning to choose or to cover, and in the earliest Vedic texts it denoted a functional division of society based on occupation and temperament, not birth. The Rigveda's Purusha Sukta (10.90) describes the four Varnas as emerging from different parts of the cosmic Purusha, a metaphor for interdependence rather than hierarchy of worth. Crucially, the Mahabharata's Shanti Parva (Chapter 188) has Yudhishthira explicitly state: 'One does not become a Brahmin by birth; it is conduct and learning that make a Brahmin.'

The conflation of Varna with hereditary jati (the hundreds of endogamous birth-groups that actually structure daily social life) happened gradually over centuries, accelerated by regional political pressures and was never universal across the subcontinent. Scholars who study Dharmashastra texts note that even Manusmriti itself (II.157) acknowledges that a Shudra who possesses the qualities of a Brahmin deserves reverence, while a Brahmin who lacks those qualities is no better than a Shudra. This internal tension within the texts is routinely overlooked in popular debate.

Which major scriptural authors were explicitly of non-Brahmin origin?

Valmiki, the composer of the Sanskrit Ramayana, is identified in the text itself as belonging to a hunter-gatherer community. Vyasa, who systematised the four Vedas and authored the Mahabharata along with the eighteen major Puranas, was born of Krishna Dvaipayana — his mother Satyavati was a fisherwoman (nishada-kanya) and his father the sage Parashara. The Vishnu Purana and Bhagavata Purana both narrate this lineage without apology, treating Vyasa's extraordinary achievement as a product of tapas and intellect, not of birth.

Among the Alvars — the twelve Tamil Vaishnava poet-saints whose Nalayira Divya Prabandham is often called the Tamil Veda — only one or two are traditionally identified as Brahmin. Thirumalaiyin Tiruvaymoli by Nammalvar, widely regarded as the summit of the entire corpus, was composed by a saint from a farming (Vellala) background. Similarly, among the 63 Nayanmars of Shaiva bhakti, the poet-saints span occupations including potter, peasant, fisherman, washerman, and soldier. The Bhagavata Purana (VII.9.10) through the words of Prahlada also affirms that devotion, not lineage, is the measure of spiritual authority.

Were Brahmins historically a privileged landowning class, or was their material condition generally modest?

The historical record, from inscriptions and copper-plate grants to travellers' accounts, consistently portrays the working Brahmin as a person of modest means dependent on dana (ritual gifts) and dakshina (priest's fee). Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang, who visited India in the 7th century CE, observed that Brahmin scholars lived simply, owned little property, and depended on village charity. The Arthashastra of Kautilya, written for the administrative class, places Brahmins outside the category of land-revenue payers precisely because they typically did not hold taxable agricultural land.

The iconic phrase 'gharib Brahmin' (the poor Brahmin) appears as a stock character across Sanskrit, Prakrit, and vernacular literature — in Panchatantra fables, in Kathakatha collections, and in Jataka stories — reflecting a social reality so consistent it became literary shorthand. The Sudama episode in the Bhagavata Purana (Canto 10, Chapters 80–81) is perhaps the most beloved illustration: Sudama, a childhood friend of Krishna, arrives at Dwaraka in tattered clothing with a handful of flattened rice as his only gift, the very image of a learned but destitute Brahmin. Wealth and ritual status were not the same thing.

Advertisement

Which ruling dynasties of India were non-Brahmin, and what role did Brahmin advisors play?

India's major imperial lineages — the Mauryas, Guptas, Chalukyas, Rashtrakutas, Cholas, Vijayanagara rulers, Marathas, and Mughals — were drawn from Kshatriya, agrarian, or tribal backgrounds. The Maurya dynasty founder Chandragupta Maurya is variously described in sources as of low-caste or tribal origin; the Chanakya-Chandragupta relationship itself is the defining historical example of a Brahmin scholar serving as strategist and minister to a non-Brahmin king, not as a ruler himself. The Gupta emperors adopted the title Mahara­jadhiraja and performed Ashvamedha yajnas precisely to legitimise Kshatriya sovereignty, with Brahmins officiating the ritual — again, as service providers, not as power holders.

The Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, who built one of the most consequential Hindu kingdoms of the early modern period, was from the Bhonsle Kshatriya lineage. His chief political philosopher and administrator, Ramadas Swami, was a Brahmin saint whose role was spiritual guidance. Even in regional polities like the Chola kingdom in Tamil Nadu — whose epigraphic record is among the richest in the world — the administrators (officials called Muvendavelar) and military commanders were predominantly non-Brahmin Vellala and Kamma communities.

How did the bhakti movement challenge and reshape ideas about ritual authority and caste?

The bhakti movement, which swept across India between roughly the 7th and 17th centuries, mounted the most sustained internal critique of caste hierarchy within the Hindu tradition. Saints such as Kabir (a weaver), Ravidas (a cobbler), Chokhamela (a Mahar from Maharashtra), and Kanakadasa (a shepherd from Karnataka) composed devotional poetry in vernacular languages — Braj Bhasha, Awadhi, Marathi, Kannada — that explicitly bypassed Sanskrit learning and Brahmin intermediaries. Their verses insisted that direct devotion to God (bhakti) was open to all regardless of Varna, and these songs became canonical within their respective regional traditions.

The Warkari tradition of Maharashtra, centred on Vitthal (Vithoba) at Pandharpur, brought together saints from across the social spectrum — Sant Dnyaneshwar (Brahmin), Sant Tukaram (Shudra kunbi), Sant Eknath (Brahmin who ate with untouchables) — under a single pilgrimage practice. The Varkari abhanga poetry is regularly sung in temple worship to this day, demonstrating that inclusion was not merely theoretical but institutionally embedded. This tradition predates modern reform movements by several centuries and represents an organic internal evolution within Sanatana Dharma.

What do the Vedas and Upanishads actually teach about human equality and the nature of the Self?

The Chandogya Upanishad's mahavakya 'Tat Tvam Asi' (That Thou Art, 6.8.7) — meaning the Atman in every individual is identical with Brahman, the ultimate Reality — leaves no philosophical room for a permanently inferior class of human beings. The Isha Upanishad opens with the declaration that the entire cosmos is pervaded by the Divine (Isavasyam idam sarvam), and its verse 6 directly states: 'One who sees all beings in the Self and the Self in all beings feels no hatred.' This non-dual vision, found in the oldest strata of Hindu philosophical thought, is the spiritual foundation upon which reformers from Adi Shankaracharya to Swami Vivekananda built their arguments for universal human dignity.

Shankaracharya's celebrated encounter with a chandala (outcaste) at Kashi — recorded in the Manisha Panchakam attributed to him — is instructive. When Shankara asked the man to step aside, the chandala responded with five verses questioning whether the Atman, being one and non-dual, can be told to move away. Shankara recognised the Divine in the chandala and composed the Manisha Panchakam in tribute. Whether fully historical or legendary, this episode is preserved and celebrated within the Brahmin Advaita tradition itself — evidence that the highest Vedantic understanding has always been self-correcting in the direction of equality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Brahmins in Indian History?

Very interesting information👌 POOR BRAHMINS It is amazing to see that how fiction can become truth in course of time! Let's examine truth based on facts and real history.

What are the key points about Brahmins in Indian History?

To start with, there is not a SINGLE Brahmin God in Hinduism! All Gods are from backward castes, dalits and tribals.

Why does Brahmins in Indian History matter in Hinduism?

It reflects core values of Sanatana Dharma and offers practical and spiritual guidance that remains relevant across generations.

How can devotees apply Brahmins in Indian History in daily life?

By reflecting on its teaching, incorporating the related practices or observances into daily routine, and approaching it with sincere devotion and understanding.